Many of the professionals around the globe are prejudicial about the career and its effects. This is true in case of medical profession too. The science of healing is an age old one created, developed, practiced and propagated from time immemorial by various civilizations that the world has seen. Out of these, the art of healing that has still been existing are Allopathy, Ayurveda, Unani, Homeopathy, Naturopathy, Tibbi, Chinese medicine, etc. Now due to the political upheavals that has resulted in changes of the world maps for centuries have undoubtedly made the Allopathy or the European system of medicine a more accepted and most applied system today. But still in the third world countries the folklore practices or the so-called complementary or alternative systems of medicine have many a times catered the needs of the local people with their knowledge.
Among the various existing systems many are not acknowledged today due to its failure to provide a scientific data in lines to the existing know-how. Even though these so-called have shown encouraging and sometimes amazing results where the main system have shown considerable failure, these systems have not been encouraged or recognized as a medical system by many governments of most countries of the world. In-fact among these systems of medical practice now-a-days are well organised and learnt in its homeland but with little or less recognition world-over. Now the question is why do the medical fraternity fight with each other for dominance. Instead it would be better that the knowledge is exchanged among the practitioners and take the best among them. This when passed on to the needy will give a better and effective treatment leading to a everlasting effect of treatment.
All systems of medicine that exist today in the world has emerged with only one aim and that is to give health for those who have asked for by the best possible means. Hence an exchange of ideas and open acceptance of the systems will surely lead to a more healthy and disease free world. Isn't this that is to be achieved by us? If yes, then why do we think of who has given the effect rather than rejoicing on obtaining a desired effect............................. CFEIA
No comments:
Post a Comment